Insight Law

Call Now For A Free Consultation | 206-922-8078

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Christopher M. Larson
  • Practice Areas
    • Tax Examinations
    • Tax Collections
    • Tax Relief
    • Business and Corporate Tax Issues
    • IRS Matters
  • Articles
  • Reviews
  • Legal Resources
    • Overview of Relevant Tax Law
    • Tax Q & A
  • Blog
  • Contact
206-922-8078
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Christopher M. Larson
  • Practice Areas
    • Tax Examinations
    • Tax Collections
    • Tax Relief
    • Business and Corporate Tax Issues
    • IRS Matters
  • Articles
  • Reviews
  • Legal Resources
    • Overview of Relevant Tax Law
    • Tax Q & A
  • Blog
  • Contact

Tax Solutions That Make Sense And Provide Maximum Relief For Your Money

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Articles
  4.  » 
  5. Sales tax assessed on gross amount of tax-included sales was improper

Sales tax assessed on gross amount of tax-included sales was improper

On behalf of Christopher Larson

In Department of Revenue v. Bi-Mor, Inc., Division 2 of the Court of Appeals of Washington determined that the Board of Tax Appeals acted properly in dismissing a tax assessment imposed by the State of Washington Department of Revenue against a taxpayer for additional retail sales taxes where it was based on the gross amount paid by patrons on tax-included sales.

Under Washington law, taxpayers offering merchandise on a tax-included sales basis must clearly state that the price includes the tax and follow certain statutory requirements when advertising tax-included sales.

Background and procedural history

The taxpayer, an operator of several Washington retail stores, conducts itself under a tax-included sales business model. The taxpayer advertises an “Always No Tax” store policy, emphasizing that the price of goods included all applicable sales taxes, or that the store was absorbing the sales tax. Instead of adding sales tax to the amount tendered by the buyer, the taxpayer manually calculated the taxes based on the tender paid by the customer by deducting an amount for the tax from the gross sale price using a method known as “backing out” the sales tax.

The Department conducted an audit of the taxpayer and assessed additional taxes for certain sales transactions where the invoice did not separate out the retail sales tax from the selling price. The assessment was affirmed in an appeal to the Department’s Appeals Division.

In a subsequent appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals, the Board reversed the ruling and dismissed the tax assessment. The Board determined that under the plain language of the sales tax statute, an assessment for additional retail taxes based on gross sales receipts was not permitted.

The Department appealed the Board’s ruling to the Thurston Superior Court, but the Board’s dismissal order was upheld.

The Department filed a further appeal of the Superior Court’s decision in Division 2 of the Court of Appeals.

The decision by the appeals court

The appeals court upheld the dismissal of the tax assessment. The appellate panel said that the wording of the tax statute unambiguously barred the Department from calculating the retail sales tax owed from a tax-included sale based on gross receipts. The appeals court determined that, since the seller advertised the price as including the sales tax, the taxpayer could back out the sales tax and the advertised price could not be considered the selling price.

The Supreme Court of Washington subsequently denied the Department’s request for further review of the case.

Contact an attorney

Individuals and businesses desiring assistance in the tax matters should consult with an experienced attorney or other tax professional that is current in this field in order to ensure that it is done correctly.

Practice Areas

  • Tax Examinations
    • Audits
    • Audit Reconsiderations
    • Tax Controversies and Litigation
    • Notice of Deficiency and Tax Court Matters
    • CP2000 Notices
    • Tax Attorney – Refund Suit in District Court
  • Tax Collections
    • Settlement and Offer in Compromises
    • Not Collectible Status/Financial Hardship
    • Reduced Installment Agreements
    • Federal Tax Levies and Garnishments
    • Federal Tax Liens
  • Tax Relief
    • Innocent Spouse Relief
    • IRS Collection Relief
    • Penalty Relief
    • Relief of Liens, Levies and Wage Garnishments
    • Tax Lawyer – Currently Not Collectible
    • Injured Spouse Relief
    • Offer In Compromise
  • Business and Corporate Tax Issues
    • Back Employment/Payroll Tax and Trust Fund Penalties
    • Entity Planning and Formation
    • Complex Individual and Business Tax Return Preparation
    • Business And Commercial Property Tax Appeals
    • Employment Taxes & Trust Fund Penalty
    • Formation and Compliance of Tax Exempt Organizations
    • Washington State Sales Tax and B&O Tax Issues
  • IRS Matters
    • Explanation of IRS Letters
    • Explanation of IRS Notices
    • IRS Appeals Procedure
    • IRS Collections
    • IRS Prepared Substitute For Return
    • Types of IRS Penalties
  • Tax Opinion Letters
  • Unfiled Tax Returns
  • Appeals
You do not need to know everything. You just need to know who to talk to.

Contact Us Today

From offices in Seattle, Bellevue and Burien, our tax law attorney advises and represents clients in communities throughout King County, Pierce County and Snohomish County. Call us or contact our office by email for an initial consultation with the experienced lawyer at our firm.

Insight Law

Phone Number

206-922-8078
  • Follow
Review The Firm

Seattle Office

701 5th Avenue
Suite 4200
Seattle, WA 98104
Seattle Location

Bellevue Office

10900 NE 4th St.
Suite 2312
Bellevue, WA 98004

Bellevue Location

Burien Office

15111 8th Ave. SW
Suite 302
Burien, WA 98166

Burien Location

© 2026 Insight Law • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw